
In the contest for most durable bridge-building material, it seems the final two contenders are always steel and concrete. It’s not surprising. Both are ubiquitous in U.S. infrastructure design, and both are known for their durability. However, it’s time to dispel the long-held myth that concrete is more durable than steel for bridge building. Here are some steel bridge construction facts to support that point:
There is no statistical evidence to support that concrete is better than steel. In fact, it has been shown that concrete cracks and has a lower tensile strength than other materials. Conversely, steel does not crack and often sees wear and tear at the joints and bearings, an easy enough fix for construction teams. It’s also relatively easy to expand steel bridges when a wider thoroughfare is needed. Concrete also takes a long time to cure, delaying construction times, and can be made up of a variety of materials and sediment that may or may not be ideal for building.
With over 80 years of bridge design and building experience, U.S. Bridge is proud to work with steel as its primary building medium. Our bridges are well-made, easy to maintain, and available in a variety of design and support types. Whatever span you need to cross, U.S. Bridge has what you need. For a free quote, please visit this link and find out how U.S. Bridge brings these steel bridge construction facts to life.
Seleccione una región o busque por estado para encontrar su contacto de U.S. Bridge.